Newsweek Runs Excellent Story on Debt Collectors

Newsweek Magazine started the New Year right – with a great story on the seedy underbelly of the debt collection industry. A former debt collector relates that she was ordered to keep calling consumers to the point of harassment, and tells tales of threats made by debt collectors to consumers. Gary Rivlin, who wrote the piece, also delves into the world of debt buying, explaining that “zombie” debt may be pursued by three or four debt collection agencies over time, subjecting the consumer to repeated inquiries about debts that have never been validated. He even explains that many debt buyers have no qualms about collecting past a debt’s statute of limitations. He notes that one debt buyer he interviewed “doesn’t bother buying the paperwork that would substantiate the data contained in the spreadsheets he buys from other debt buyers because, he explains, that bumps up the cost of the purchase and therefore eats into the bottom line.

Sergei Lemerg is also quoted in the article, commenting on the Federal Trade Commission report that shows a huge uptick in consumer complaints about debt collectors. Lemberg says that the FTC numbers are “just the tip of the iceberg.”

You can read the full article at the Daily Beast: http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2012/01/01/america-s-abusive-debt-collectors.html

Media Coverage for Lemberg & Associates

We received some nice media coverage from the Leader-Herald. You can read the story here:

Gloversville woman sues debt collector

Press Coverage for Lemberg & Associates

We received some nice press coverage from the Associated Press. Here’s a link to the story:

Debt Collectors: Business Great But Hard as Ever

U.S. District Court Grants Class Certification in Debt Collection Case Against Portfolio Recovery

We reached a milestone in Zimmerman v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, namely that the U.S. District Court granted our motions for summary judgment and class certification. We issued the following press release yesterday:

SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 - STAMFORD, CT - The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York has granted the plaintiff’s motions for summary judgment and class certification in Zimmerman v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC. According to Jason Zimmerman’s attorney, Sergei Lemberg, “We are pleased that the Court ruled in our favor, granting summary judgment in favor of 990 consumers victimized by Portfolio Recovery Associates.”

The facts of the case revolve around a debt collection “Pre-Suit Package” that was sent under Portfolio Recovery Associates “Litigation Department” letterhead and included a cover letter, as well as documents that appeared to be a “lawsuit,” including a “Summons” and a “Complaint” that referenced the District Court of the County of Nassau, First District, and listed Zimmerman as the defendant. The cover letter said, in part, “Enclosed please find a copy of the lawsuit our local counsel in your state intends to file against you related to the delinquent account referenced above.” However, a closer examination of the papers revealed that the Pre-Suit Package did not contain actual legal papers, but rather were simulated legal papers made to look real.

The Court found that Portfolio Recovery Associates violated provisions of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) relating to “[t]he use or distribution of any written communication which simulates or is falsely represented to be a document authorized, issued, or approved by any court…of the United States…, or which creates a false impression as to its source, authorization, or approval,” or which constitutes “[t]he false representation or implication that documents are legal process. ” The Court’s opinion stated, “The ‘least sophisticated consumer’ might well conclude that Defendant had initiated a lawsuit to collect the debt, given the form of the Summons and Complaint, the reference to the court and parties…and the fact that an attorney from Portfolio’s “Litigation Department” had signed the cover letter.

Lemberg said, “The law unequivocally prohibits debt collection agencies from sending official-looking documents that lead consumers to believe that they are being sued; it is quite surprising that the practice persists.” Noting that it would be cumbersome for the 990 consumers affected by Portfolio Recovery Associates’ “Pre-Suit Package” to individually pursue actions against the debt collector, Lemberg applauded the Court’s decision to grant class certification. “We look forward to obtaining money for all of the consumers who were impacted by PRA’s actions.”

This release references Zimmerman v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC (U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, 1:09-cv-04602-PGG).

Advice for Employers via BBB Newsletter

We were happy to contribute an article for the recent edition of the Connecticut Better Business Bureau’s newsletter. We’ve pasted the text below:

Workplace Disruptions: What to Do When Debt Collectors Call Employees on the Job
by Contributor Sergei Lemberg

When your employees walk through the door, you rightfully expect to have their undivided attention. These days, the ubiquity of Facebook, Twitter, smartphones and apps can create a bevy of unwanted distractions.

Although workplace policies vary, the norm is to ask employees to refrain from engaging in personal tweeting, texting, and emailing during business hours. Many businesses also prohibit employees from receiving personal phone calls at work. Yet, some debt collection agencies are persistent in their attempts to contact consumers at their places of employment.

If this situation crops up in your business, it’s helpful to understand three things: your employee’s situation, the law regarding debt collection and workplace contact, and the course of action you can take to prevent further calls and distractions.

Your Employee’s Situation
When it comes to your employee, it’s important not to jump to conclusions. Your employee may not be willfully handling personal matters at work. Many times, debt collectors don’t heed requests to refrain from calling consumers at work. In other words, the debt collector, rather than the employee, may be at fault.

Alternately, the debt collector may be attempting to collect on a debt that isn’t the employee’s to pay. Some debt collectors contact relatives of a deceased person in an attempt to collect the decedent’s debt. Debt buyers sometimes have the sketchiest of information on a debtor, and confuse a consumer with a similar name to the debtor.

Debt Collection Law
Even if the employee does owe the debt in question, the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) specifically outlines prohibited practices regarding workplace contact. The law says that a debt collector can’t communicate with a consumer “at the consumer’s place of employment if the debt collector knows or has reason to know that the consumer’s employer prohibits the consumer from receiving such communication.” In practice, this means that if your employee tells the debt collection agency – verbally or in writing – that he or she isn’t allowed to take personal calls at work, the debt collector isn’t allowed to call.

Your Course of Action
If an employee is receiving calls on the job from debt collectors, there are a number of steps you can take:

1. Speak to the employee - Reiterate the company policy against handling personal business at work, and ask if he or she has informed the debt collection agency about this policy.

2. Speak to other employees - In a manner that doesn’t further embarrass the employee being contacted, instruct other employees not to engage in conversations with the debt collector and to refrain from providing the collector with the debtor’s personal or identifying information.

3. Send a cease and desist letter - Encourage the employee to write a cease and desist letter to the collection agency. The FDCPA says that once such a letter is received, the debt collector may no longer contact the consumer. In addition, determine the name of the collection agency and send a letter from your company demanding that the calls stop.

4. Contact the police - If the calls continue after sending a cease and desist letter, the debt collector calling your employee is likely a scam artist. The FBI and other government agencies have issued alerts about current scams involving contact information gathered through hacking payday loan and other sites.

In closing, be aware that a debt collection agency may contact you for the purpose of verifying or correcting information about an employee or former employee. According to the FDCPA, a debt collector may contact a third party for the purpose of obtaining location information – but cannot reveal that the consumer owes a debt. However, you are under no obligation to provide the debt collector with information, and the debt collector can only contact you once.

Sergei Lemberg Named “Most Active Consumer Attorney”

WebRecon tracks statistics regarding the number of consumer lawsuits filed alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Truth in Lending Act, and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. As reported in debt collection industry publication InsideARM, StopCollector’s Sergei Lemberg was named the “most active consumer attorney” for the second half of July. The team at Lemberg & Associates is proud to represent consumers who are victimized by unscrupulous debt collectors.

Investigative Reporters Win Prestigious Award for Debt Collection Series

Chris Serres and Glenn Howatt were accorded the 2011 Gerald Loeb Award for Distinguished Business and Financial Journalism for their investigative series, “Hounded: Debtors and the New Breed of Collectors,” which appeared in the Minneapolis Star-Tribune. According to an article in the Star-Tribune, the journalists also won the American Bar Association’s Silver Gavel Award, which is accorded for work that advances public understanding of the legal system.

Congratulations to both reporters for much-deserved recognition for an outstanding series of articles. If you didn’t get a chance to read “Hounded,” you can find it here.

How Low Can You Go? Defense Attorney Tactics in Debt Collection Cases

We all know that some debt collectors will go to any length – even if it means breaking the law – to squeeze money out of consumers. Our clients have told us horror stories about debt collector harassment and abuse, and the media has reported on egregious and all-too-common violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

On occasion, we’ve discussed the ways in which debt collection agencies manipulate and clog the taxpayer-funded court system in order to obtain summary judgments against unwitting consumers. What we haven’t talked about, though, is the callous tactics that debt collection agency attorneys use when we fight for our clients’ rights.

Case in point: Witness depositions in one of our debt collection cases – Ray Tedeschi v. Kason Credit Corporation (U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut, 3:10-cv-612-WWE) were scheduled for this week. Last weekend, I learned that a close relative’s death was imminent. I emailed James Mulholland, the debt collection agency’s attorney, explaining the situation and asking him if we could file a joint motion to extend discovery – not an unusual request under the circumstances, and one rooted in an acknowledgement of basic human decency. Mulholland didn’t respond to my message or confirm its receipt.

Sadly, my relative did pass away, so I notified Mulholland that I would be leaving town to be with family and attend the funeral. Again, no response or acknowledgement. When I returned, I wrote him again, asking to reschedule our client’s deposition. Mulholland refused to grant my request. As a result, I was forced to file a court motion and obtain a judge’s ruling to extend the deadline two and a half weeks. The judge, showing more compassion than opposing counsel, granted our motion. But it made me think… How low can you go?

Get Out of Debt Guy Needs to Get a Clue

If you’ve never heard of Steve Rhode, well, neither had we until we saw his ludicrous blog post, “Does the Wave of Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) Suits Benefit Consumers or Lawyers?” Rhode credits a “tipster” with forwarding an article about a fair debt attorney in Minnesota who was disbarred. He then regurgitates the article, from debt collection industry newsletter InsideARM. Rhode, who touts himself as the “get out of debt guy,” then reprints statistics from InsideARM (which InsideARM reprinted from WebRecon) listing “FDCPA and Other Consumer Lawsuit Statistics, October 1-15, 2010.” Rhode then goes on to diss other fair debt attorneys, and insinuates that active fair debt attorneys may be in line to lose their licenses.

Given that Sergei Lemberg is listed among the “most active consumer attorneys of the year (a badge he wears with pride), we take exception to Rhode’s insinuation that fair debt attorneys are only out to make a buck. Given the egregious collection practices of untold numbers of debt collectors, and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act’s crystal clarity about what constitutes unfair debt collection practices, debt collectors have no excuse for crossing the line. If consumer attorneys don’t hold them accountable, who will?

It’s more than a bit ironic that Rhode, who positions himself (with Beck-ian overtones) as a truth-teller that others are trying to silence, disses lawyers while infusing his website with Google ads for “credit law attorneys,” “ask a lawyer online now,” “find a lawyer – free” and the like. Then there are the ads encouraging people to “Get a Personal Loan!” In our eyes, that’s a bit hypocritical for the “get out of debt guy.”

Cleaning Up Old Debts

creditcardsFox Business recently offered a reminder that, if you have the cash to settle a debt, you can often negotiate a terrific deal. Debt buyers purchase written-off debt for pennies on the dollar, so if you offer to settle for a quarter on the dollar, they’ll often do so. The article, which was written in response to a consumer who wondered how to locate the owner of an old debt, noted that your credit reports will likely record the debt owner, and that states have statutes of limitations, after which time a debt is uncollectible. What it didn’t mention, however, was that if you choose to negotiate a settlement, it’s important to get the deal in writing. After all, debt collection agencies have high staff turnover, so the deal you broker with one debt collector won’t necessarily be recognized by the next.

Older Posts »