The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act was passed in 1978, and hasn’t been substantially amended since then. As such, it hasn’t kept up with technological advances. For example, although some people had answering machines back then, they weren’t in wide use. How then, do the provisions of the FDCPA that require that debt collectors identify themselves to consumers jibe with the provisions that prohibit debt collectors from disclosing their identities to third parties? In other words, if a debt collector calls and leaves a message on an answering machine (or voicemail), does he say he’s with the XYZ agency? If so, and if someone else hears it, he’s violating the law. Yet if he calls and leaves a message saying to call back, without identifying himself as a debt collector, he’s violating the law.
In a case recently decided in the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Niagara Credit Solutions argued that it had to violate one law to comply with the other. Thankfully, the judge didn’t buy that argument, saying, “The law does not guarantee a debt collector the right to leave answering machine messages.”




